AFib is associated with a five-fold increase in risk for stroke ; worsens underlying cardiovascular disease ; and doubles the chance of all-cause mortality. Regardless of the far-reaching effect of AFib, many healthcare professionals lack the tools to explain the condition and its potential consequences to patients. Actually, a 2009 Yankelovich survey discovered that 42 % of physicians reported having to use their very own drawings to guide patient discussions about AFib, while over fifty % of nurses report utilizing their hands to spell it out AFib.Even though many editors dislike this practice, it is used frequently, for a true number of reasons. One is certainly that in specialized fields, authors could be ideal qualified to suggest suitable reviewers for the manuscript and topic involved. Another is certainly that it makes life easier for editors: finding appropriate peer reviewers who are willing to review regularly can be both hard and frustrating. A third reason could be that journals and publishers are increasingly multinational.